Our topic this week here at the LadyKillers literary salon is "Real Life vs. Virtual Life." I don't know about you, but I'm not sure there's enough caffeine in the world for me to do this subject justice on a Monday morning, but you know me. I'm always game. I'm thinking of having a family crest designed with the motto, "I'll give it a shot. How hard can it be? " Except I think this new family motto will look much more aristocratic once it has been translated into Latin and inscribed in Gothic calligraphy.
The question of real life versus virtual life seems new to the current inhabitants of the planet, because computer technology puts it in our faces every day. When we watch a movie, we ask ourselves, "Did the actor playing Spiderman leap off the tops of skyscrapers while shooting artificial spiderweb fiber from his wrists so that he could swing through Manhattan like a monkey through a jungle?" When the inevitable answer is, "No," we ask ourselves, "Did he swing across a movie set with fake skyscrapers behind him, while wearing a safety harness? Or did a computer generate the whole thing?" For most the us, the answer to that question is, "I'm not sure." In other words, somebody just reached in my head, grabbed the concept of reality, shook it up like a cup of Yahtzee dice, then poured those dice back in my head and said, "Have a nice day."
I think we overestimate the newness of this phenomenon. When Og and Olga the Cavepeople sat around the campfire and told stories about wooly mammoths they had slain, their fellow cavepeople were free to take them at their word. Or not. "You should have seen him! He was taller than the trees and the ground shook when he walked and he had one big eye in the middle of his forehead! This here mammoth we just ate is a monster, but you should've seen the one that got away!"
Much, much later, the printing press made it possible for the storytellers in our midst to reach far beyond the small circle of compatriots around our personal campfires. (And we thank you for that, Herr Gutenberg.)
I routinely get emails from people who want to know whether a particular character or place in my stories is real. I do not leap into the world of existentialism and ask them in return to define what they mean by "real" before I answer their question. Why do I not ask them to do this? Because I am not a first-class jerk. I hope. Otherwise, I would just quote some impenetrable bit of Sartre, "Man first of all exists, encounters himself, surges up in the world – and defines himself afterwards," and leave them hating me, with their questions unanswered.
Do I have a point here? Yeah, I do. What was it? I guess my Monday-morning brain is just trying to say that the imaginary creations that we call "virtual" in the video game and movie world are nothing more than the recreation of the imaginary things we've always held between our ears. In some ways, a fearsome alien that has never existed outside a computer's brain or on a movie screen is no different than a fearsome beast that never existed outside the brains of Olga the Cavewoman and her rapt audience. They both have a lot in common with the imaginary characters that I drop into Faye Longchamp's world. Their population grows with every book I write.
Olga's beast was independent of the magical science inside a computer and inside a printing machine, so it may have been the most virtual creation of all. I raise my morning cup of caffeine to Olga and to you all. Cheers!
Mary Anna















Mary Anna, you make an excellent point. Man has always used his/her imagination to dream up people and places, and the virtual reality of the computer world is merely an extension of that. Great blog!
Posted by: Staci | August 20, 2012 at 11:11 AM
Very thoughtful post, Mary Anna... limited caffeine intake or not. :-) Of course, "real" has always been subject to being twisted by the mass of tissue we call a brain. Dreams? Hallucinations? Visions? Maybe no one else sees them, but our bodies react as if what we "see" is real.
So, do we have to be able to pound on it to make it real? What about love and hate, then?
Okay, enough late-night philosophizing here on the West Coast...
Posted by: Ann | August 20, 2012 at 10:45 PM
Thanks, y'all. I am currently in caffeine-input mode so that I can respond to your comments semi-coherently. :)
If I thought too much about the fact that I can really count on nothing except for the fact that the mass of pink jelly inside my skull is telling me things that may or may not reflect what is happening outside my skull, then it would take more than caffeine to get me going in the morning. And if that thought messed with everybody else's personal cup of Yahtzee dice, I apologize profoundly as I raise this can of Coke in your direction. Cheers!
Posted by: Mary Anna Evans | August 21, 2012 at 04:35 AM
Og and Olga got to me. Makes perfect sense. Thank you, Mary Anna for a delightful posting.
Posted by: Priscilla | August 21, 2012 at 06:07 PM
I think maybe I'll let Og and Olga write all my future posts.
Oh, wait. Silly me. They can't write.
Posted by: Mary Anna Evans | August 21, 2012 at 07:15 PM
It's going to get to the point where people won't meet up any more. They will have cyber meet ups. With the communication access we have with the internet we have become less intimate with our friends and peers.
Posted by: Mike | October 17, 2012 at 07:49 AM