Monday


Mysti Berry

Michael Black

Tuesday


Priscilla Royal

Susan Shea

Wednesday


Penny Warner
First Wed

Carole Price
Third Wed

Second and Fourth Wed

Terry Shames

Thursday


Staci McLaughlin

Hannah Jayne
 

Friday


Rita Lakin
First Friday
 

Sharan Newman
Third Friday

Second and Fourth Fridays

Margaret Lucke

Saturday


Ann Parker
  

Patricia L. Morin
 
Blog powered by TypePad

Mercury's Rise Wins Prize

  • We're so proud of Ann Parker and her fabulous Inez--they've won the 2012 Bruce Alexander Memorial Historical Mystery award at Left Coast Crime. Well deserved, Ann!

« Telling Details By Michael A. Black | Main | Create a sense of place through telling details »

February 26, 2013

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

camille minichino

Excellent examples, Susan. What I find annoying and distracting is when that same level of detail is used for every character, even a clerk I'll only see once. One detail is enough to give us a picture if he's simply a passerby.

Terry Shames

Agreed, Susan. Details can slow the pace so that the reader sneaks up on something significant. And if the something significant doesn't happen...well, all the writer did was slow the pace. No fiction benefits from detail just for detail's sake.

Pat Morin

I agree with both Camille and Terry. Also, some important details are lumped together instead of being integrated strategically in the front story so that the action doesn't lag. I really liked the example, too.

Staci

Padding the story with extra details is the worst. I end up being so frustrated with the story when I find out none of it mattered. It can be hard, though, to figure out which details to cut, which is where an impartial beta reader or editor can really come in handy.

Michael A. Black

Eloquently stated, Susan. As Ibsen said, if you show the audience a gun in the first act, they will expect it to be used by the third. (At least I think it was Ibsen.)

Susan Shea

Michael, It may have been Chekhov who said it, but the point's the same and spot on. Staci, you're right - beta readers really help with that and so many other aspects of sharpening and focusing our work. Good point, Pat: Not every detail should cone at the beginning; that's a drag on the story as well. Camille and Terry, my question to myself is, if this is all so clear, how come I'm still tempted to sneak in just one more clever detail?!

Mysti Berry

one of my favorite sentences is 10 lines long, full of physical detail and backstory: Flannery O'Connor's The Violent Bear It Away. The first 30 pages of that book are astonishing.

Sadly, I imitated the form (unconsciously) but not the skill in the first 5 chapters of my first crime novel. It's taken me months to un-Flannery it ;)

Darlings indeed!

Susan Shea

Mysti, It's a tough call to pull back from something we love, even if it's an unconscious homage to another writer. I'm not sure you need to un-Flannery in every way, just get more comfortable with what's at the heart of her style and translate it into your own, unique voice. After all, published authors brag about "channeling" Dashiell Hammett and Arthur Conan Doyle all the time!

The comments to this entry are closed.